Hi guys, Well, a lot great info, a few minor inaccuracy's. In turn, this implies that Thiel's passive radiator is a "good" trade-off between sealed and ported enclosures. So, Hardesty was a big fan of sealed enclosures (and even bigger fan of Vandersteens) yet he implied that the Thiel's passive radiator sounded not too different from that of a sealed enclosure. Alignment is unusual and bass is tightly controlled with little evidence that the enclosures are not sealed. They have vented bass loading utilizing passive radiators rather than ports. A side benefit is that reduced excursion will also produce lower steady-state harmonic distortion measurements.Īnd Hardesty in his review of the Thiel CS6 in APJ Vol. The one advantage that vented enclosure designs offer is a reduction in cone excursion at low frequencies.Reduced cone excursion allows vented designs to play louder. There is one very good reason-high output. You might ask why anyone would choose to make a vented subwoofer. Vented subwoofers offer inferior performance compared to sealed enclosure subwoofers of equivalent quality in the following areas: transient response, phase response, group delay,and low frequency extension.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |